Compact Contract

A brief look at topical issues in contract

26 April 2019 - Jon Turnbull

In Triple Point v PTT, the Court of Appeal considered to what extent liquidated damages continue to be payable when a project falls into delay and the contract is subsequently terminated or the contractor replaced. This situation is common in construction projects – where liquidated damages clauses are ubiquitous (albeit this case was in relation › Read More

11 March 2019 - Bianca Vasilache

In Cargill International Trading v Uttam Galva Steels, the High Court decided by summary judgment that a default interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 12% was valid and enforceable. It did not amount to a penalty, it was validly incorporated into the contract and it was not illegal under Indian law. In 2015, Cargill entered › Read More

29 March 2018 - Jason Rix

Last week, Richard Hooley gave one of his regular talks on recent developments in banking and finance law. Below I have set out a couple of knotty contractual issues I noted down: “Clever” (or careful) drafting may stop a clause being a penalty (Holyoake v Candy). A requirement to pay a redemption amount on voluntary early › Read More

17 March 2018 - Oliver Rule

A company voluntary arrangement (or CVA) – the procedure under the Insolvency Act through which companies can compromise their liabilities provided enough creditors agree – is often thought of as statutory contract. But, as Wright v Prudential Assurance shows, this does not mean that every contractual principle applies to a CVA. BHS’ stores were costing › Read More

15 December 2017 - Jason Rix

Last month, a group of us (Erwan Poisson, Joost Everaert, Julie Metois, James Freeman and I) gave some training on limiting liability in commercial contracts. So far so unsurprising. The sting in tail was that we were covering the topic under Belgian, French and English law. This served to highlight some legal and cultural differences › Read More

09 March 2017 - Orla Fox

The High Court has applied the Makdessi test on penalty clauses to the terms of a side letter between a tenant of retail premises and the landlord. In doing so it held that the termination provision in the side letter amounted to an unenforceable penalty. Following Makdessi, when considering whether a clause is a penalty, the first › Read More

25 October 2016 - Jason Rix

In November 2015 the UK Supreme Court restated the test for penalty clauses in Cavendish v Makdessi. One year on, how is the test being applied by the courts? There has been much debate around whether provisions are primary or secondary obligations. Members of the court in Makdessi did not agree on this point on › Read More